logo_amma

AMMA-MIP

AMMA-Model Intercomparison Program

AMMA cross-section


modelling setup model diagnostics Analyses Data products CGM outputs Comparison


SCIENTIFIC CONTEXT

West Africa is characterized by well defined strong meridian surface gradients, illustrated here with  a map of June 1996 surface albedo (Fig 1).  This feature is coupled to well defined atmospheric circulations (Fig 2), such as the African easterly jet (AEJ) which develops over West Africa during the monsoon season typically between 10 & 15° N. The location of the AEJ itself is strongly constrained by meridian gradients of surface air  temperature and moist static energy (Thorncroft & Blackburn 1999). More genrally, interannual variability of the monsoon is acompanied by changes in these basic structures (Fig. 3). Synoptic variability over West Africa during the monsoon season in turn is dominated by African easterly waves (AEW), which are closely linked to the AEJ (Burpee 1972). Then, the structure and variability of these basic large-scale features involve strong and complex interactions with soil, surface, turbulent and convective processes, occurring on different space and time scales (Taylor and Lebel 1998, Diongue et al. 2002, see also Parker et al. 2005 for an investigation of the diurnal cycle of the monsoon flow). Finally, the West African monsoon exhibits specific seasonal variations, with in particular an onset characterized by an abrupt latitudinal shift (~5°N) occurring typically at the end of June (Sultan and Janicot 2003), to be compared to a more progressive latitudinal retreat (Fig. 3).
While current (re-)analyses are able to reasonably capture the dynamics of these large-scale dynamical features (Reed et al. 1988, Thorncroft et al. 2003), with limitations though (e.g., Diongue et al. 2002, Redelsperger et al. 2002), the extent to which large-scale models are able to properly reproduce these observations remains unclear. Large-scale models appear to be able to generate  AEW-type synoptic variability (Ceron and Gueremy 1999, Chauvin et al. 2005), although quantitative aspects are likely to vary among models. Features such as the monsoon jump have been shown to be sensitive to the treatment of moisture processes in convective parametrizations (Fig. 5, Grandpeyx et al 2004). Similarly, the simulated diurnal cycle of moist convection typically exhibits a  phase shift of a few to several hours compared to observations, which may affect the large-scale modelling over this region.   
 
OBJECTIVE

The objective of the present exercise is therefore to get a more precise view concerning the ability of large-scale models to simulate these fundamental features of the West African monsoon. To do so, we follow an approach initially proposed by Siebesma et al. (2004), that was applied to the atmospheric tropical circulation over the Pacific Ocean. It consists in defining an appropriate vertical cross section over which the large-scale atmospheric models are compared to observational products (including satellite and re-analyses datasets). According to what was summarized above, we decided to focus on a meridian cross section over West Africa .

 

albedo
Fig1: albedo for June 1996 [Source: EUMETSAT/JRC]

 
 

ecmwf ERA

 
Fig 2: [10W,10E] 2000-2001 July mean latitude height diagrams of zonal wind (top left) - Disoline = 2.5 m/s, meridian wind (top right) - Disoline = 1 m/s, vertical wind (bottom left) - Disoline = 0.5 mm/s, and potential temperature -Disoline = 5 K.  [Source: Peyrillé et al. (2005)] 

 
grist_nicholson_jclim2001
Fig 3:  [Source: Grist and Nicholson  (2001)] 

 
sultan_janicot_jclim2003

 
Fig 4:  [Source: Sultan and Janicot (2003)] 

grandpeyx_etal_qjrms2004

 
Fig 5: [Source: J.-Y. Grandpeix et al. (2004)]