ALATNET developments in 2000 in the ALATNET centers

alatnet.gif 1. In Toulouse (France) during the last 6 months of 2000

The ALATNET actions in Toulouse during the first 6 months of 2000 were reported in Newsletter 18, only the actions of the last 6 months of 2000 are presented here.

1. Theoretical aspects of non-hydrostatism (NH) & 2. Case studies aspects of NH (2c: Solving residual instability problems in the two-time-level semi-Lagrangian advection scheme)

4. Removal of the thin layer hypothesis 6. Specific coupling problems (6a: Blending of fields in data assimilation for preserving high resolution forecast details) 6. Specific coupling problems (6b: Tendency coupling for surface pressure and other technical variations around Davies' technique of field coupling in a buffer zone) 6. Specific coupling problems (6c: Coupling problems in variational data assimilation) 8. Adaptation of physics to higher resolution (8b: Test, retuning and improvement of the various physical parameterisation in the framework of a very high resolution) 8. Adaptation of physics to higher resolution (8c: Improved representation of boundary layer) 9. Design of new physical parameterisations (9b: Use of liquid water and ice as prognostic variables, implementation of a new microphysics parameterisation) 9. Design of new physical parameterisations (9d: Improved representation of exchanges at sea surface)

Eric Bazile tested two modifications of the parameterisation of evaporation over sea using parallel one-month long 4d-var assimilation experiments :

The global hydrological cycle and the trade winds are better described, though an improvement of scores is noticed only for buoy observations in the Tropics.

9. Design of new physical parameterisations (9e: Improved representation of land surface, including the impact of vegetation and snow)

10. Use of new observations (10a: Yet unused SYNOP observations) 11. 3D-Var analysis and variational applications

Beside the long term studies of Cornel Soci and Wafaa Sadiki, detailed in specific articles, most of the work along the last months was devoted to :

A review of the latest developments around 3d-var assimilation is also available in this Newsletter.

12. 4D-Var assimilation (12d: Improvement of the treatment of humidity in data assimilation)

2. In Bruxelles (Belgium)    alatnet1.gif

Last (and first) report in Newsletter 18.
 
 

alatnet2.gif   3. In Prague (Czech Republic)

Topic 1: Theoretical aspects of non-hydrostatism

The study has been started using a simulation of trapped lee waves, both in semi-Lagrangian 3TL and Eulerian schemes. Refer, please, to the report of Chris in this Newsletter. The basic predictor-corrector scheme has been developed in the framework of a vertical plane model, both for Eulerian and semi-Lagrangian advection schemes. At the same time a linear stability analysis tool has been created following the Simmons-Hoskins-Burridge (SHB) approach (in a close collaboration with P. Bénard). It helped to reveal the following very important points: (i) the SHB instability with respect to the departure of temperature from its semi-implicit basic value (there is a different dependency for the fully compressible equations than for hydrostatic primitive equations (HPE)); (ii) a discretization of the "non-hydrostatic"" part of pressure force which was not in accordance with its semi-implicit treatment and hence, there was a hidden source of instability; (iii) a good step forward to stabilize the 2TL SL scheme by finding terms which extrapolation leads to instability (confirming experiments from 1997 partly done by M. Janousek in Toulouse). Refer, please, to the report of Jozef for more details. A revision of the pressure force discretization respecting the angular momentum conservation was done both for HPE equations using the "NH-type"" of the logarithmic pressure thickness approximation (NDLNPR=1) and for the compressible equations. It was found that the so-called "happy cancellation"" of terms in the total pressure force expression is valid as well for NDLNPR=1 setting contrary to past analysis of the problem. The examination of the "compressible"" case led to a problematic point on how to ensure the angular momentum conservation as well for the NH pressure departure part (due to the different vertical staggering of the hydrostatic pressure and its NH complement). This point is in connection with the above mentioned current choice of an unstable" discretization, which respects the angular momentum conservation but which is not secured by the linear S.-I. correction. A solution how to conciliate both the stability and the full angular momentum conservation has not been really thought over yet. Another little revision dealt with the top boundary condition for the vertical momentum equation, where both Dirichlet and von Neumann types of conditions for the NH pressure departure variable were formulated and tested. Finally, Dirichlet condition was retained as more stable for the vertical momentum equation. The experiments were made for the "SCANIA"" type of idealized atmosphere (just orographic forcing at geostrophic balance and vertical static stability of the flow). There is a strong vertical temperature gradient with top model temperatures below 50K. Under such conditions there is a violent SHB instability in the compressible model. The goal of experiments was to obtain as many instability diagnostics as possible, in order to confirm indirectly the SHB analysis results, to see the response of purely non-linear terms (not covered by the linear stability analysis) and to possibly indicate what kind of dependency the instability has on the hydrostatic pressure semi-implicit reference state. However, the experimental environment was too complex and the results were not very conclusive.

Topic 2. High resolution runs (D. Cemas, U. Strajnar, N. Pristov, B. Ahrens)

In parallel to the theoretical work and academic experiments, the real-case studies using a very high horizontal resolution started. One of the first objectives was to prepare an experimental protocol leading to the tests at 1km grid-size, e.g. to define ALADIN domains going progressively from ALADIN/LACE (12km) to a domain of 1km, considering also a proportional increase of the vertical resolution. In order to obtain a good description of the model orography at 1km grid-size, a very fine mesh input data set of orography is needed. Therefore a domain over Slovenia was chosen in order to profit from both the local ee923 configuration and available data-set. Unfortunately, the ee923 configuration did not work any more in Ljubljana (due to the change of cycle and machine) and not yet in Prague (port of this configuration has not yet been completed), hence all the experiments were done for the time being on the domain "GORI"" with 2.5 km horizontal resolution. The testing situation was one of MAP IOPs wet cases. The experiments were done always with HPE and NH versions of ALADIN. Concerning the nesting of domains, GORI domain simulations were coupled either directly with LACE model or with a nested intermediate 5km grid-size model. As short and quite preliminary conclusions, problems were noticed with the parameterization of deep convection at 2.5 km mesh, where the convective rain pattern became quite noisy and unrealistic. Perhaps it would have been better to fully switch off the deep convection scheme at these scales. In addition, we could notice worse results when GORI domain was directly coupled with LACE domain (probably due to both spatial and temporal resolutions of the lateral boundary conditions: the smaller the domain was, the more frequently refreshment of the lateral boundary was needed).

Bodo Ahrens from the University of Vienna proceeded along similar lines and did fine-mesh simulations over the Ticino-Verzaska-Maggia region with ALADIN NH at 9.6 km and 4 km horizontal resolutions. After a short stay in Prague to get familiar with ALADIN NH version he continued his work in Vienna, concentrating on the quantitative precipitation forecasts. Please, refer to his report in ALADIN Newsletter for details.

Topic 6. Special coupling issues

ALADIN/LACE forecasts starting from blended initial states were evaluated by both objective methods and forecaster's experience. Regarding the objective verification, standard scores were computed for both 00 and 12 UTC network times (D. Klaric). There was a nice reduction of bias at the initial time, especially in humidity and wind fields. Otherwise the scores were rather neutral with a few weak improvements. On the other hand there was a yet unexplained worse bias in surface pressure for the network time of 12 UTC, while better bias results could be noticed for 00, 06 and 18 UTC after a more profound investigation. The hypothesis to be still verified is that there was a tidal wave pattern at work.

The standard scores were completed by an objective evaluation of the spin-up measured by the physical fluxes of water vapor (balance of precipitation and evaporation) and radiation (K. Stadlbacher, D. Klaric). While the balance of radiation flux was rather indifferent, the water vapor flux had clearly a reduced spin-up both for stratiform and convective precipitation. Even the convective precipitation flux was a bit too active for 12 UTC network time, a fact deserving as well some deeper investigations.

Finally, a forecaster's assessment of the blending" benefices was done last October (H. Seidl) for a few recent cases of the late summer convection. The examined forecast range was from 0 to 6 hours. The conclusion was that the blending forecast built up more realistic (organised) structures in some cases but not noticeably in all cases. In this exercise it was quite difficult to find some purely objective method of evaluation: due to coarse conventional observations a verifying analysis (a diag-pack type with a lot of fit to the observations) provided just very smooth fields with no real meso-scale structures in. Hence, satellite pictures were compared subjectively to the cloudiness and potential vorticity fields of the model.

The overall result of these evaluations is that the blending has beneficial effects on the forecast namely in reducing the spin-up. Therefore it is considered to be employed operationally in ALADIN/LACE after some basic cleaning of the scripts to respond to the operational standards.

Just before Christmas first comprehensive tests of variously built 3DVAR algorithms were run on ALADIN/LACE domain. The algorithmic tree offers quite many possible solutions to choose a proper first guess (ALADIN forecasts, blended initial states, ARPEGE analysis) with the Jb model (classical or lagged forecast error statistics), yet all that possibly combined with the DFI incremental approach to get-rid of the initialization wiping-out of small scales" in the model forecast. There are plenty of obviously looking but still unanswered questions, for example whether to make first the blending and second the 3D VAR analysis or the contrary, how to combine all that with the surface analysis, etc. All these possible ingredients would please even the best royal alchemists at the famous court of the emperor Rudolf II. This first attempt to assess a potential of the ALADIN 3D-VAR data assimilation might give us an indication which algorithms were the most prospective ones, though there were still serious limitations in this experiment: (i) an incremental DFI approach was still missing; (ii) we used a hypothesis that finer structure functions in ALADIN might hopefully play a positive role even without a higher density of observations (in this experiment the set of observations but TOVS was the same as in the global model assimilation; the missing TOVS were hopefully not much penalising over the rather continental domain of LACE).

The previous research results on Jb statistics are explained in details in a RC LACE Technical Note (available on request) and summed up in an article soon to be submitted for publication.

A development has been started to test a new way of coupling surface pressure. The motivation (after Gustafsson, personal communication) is the following:

Within the spatial interpolation procedure from the coarser to the finer mesh, a weak discordance is introduced between the fields of orography and surface pressure. When these too fields are not well adjusted to each other, a gravity wave noise is generated. After some time the model finds a balanced state (within a DFI session for example) except at the relaxation/coupling lateral belt of the domain, where the large scale" solution, containing the above mentioned discordance due to the interpolation, is partly or fully retained. A way to repair this weakness is to couple the tendency of surface pressure instead of its absolute value. In this case it is hoped that the orography-pressure discordance is not induced at every coupling event (every time-step) to the model solution. The modified coupling scheme has been developed and is currently under testing, first in a simplified framework of a 2D vertical plane model.
 
 

4. In Budapest (Hungary)    alatnet3.gif

INTRODUCTION

The activities around ALATNET started very effectively in 2000, which gives a good hope for the overall execution of the scientific objectives of the project. Regarding the topics where the Hungarian Meteorological Service is concerned most of them started in 2000. Hereafter these topics are described and then detailed status report will be given on the topics which are executed in Budapest. It is mentioned that unfortunately we couldn't manage to find a post-doc student working on the proposed 3DVAR-related topic in Budapest. New call for candidates are being issued at the very beginning of the year 20001.

ACTIVITIES ON ALATNET TOPICS

Based on the work plan of the ALATNET project the topics (where HMS is concerned) where work had been started will be listed (there will not be detailed descriptions due to the fact that those are available at the given center's report):

Topic 1. Theoretical aspects of the non-hydrostatism

Topic 2. Case studies aspects of NH Topic 5. Coupling in high resolution modes Topic 6. Specific coupling problems Topic 9. Design of new physical parametrisations Topic 11. 3DVAR analysis and variational applications ALATNET ACTIVITIES IN BUDAPEST

In this chapter more details will be given in the topics being carried out in Budapest, mainly the 3DVAR-related work will be mentioned.

At the end of May and the beginning of June a 3DVAR workshop was held in Budapest with the participation of Claude Fischer (France) and Maria Siroka (Slovakia). As a result of this workshop a prototype 3DVAR assimilation suite was implemented. See the ALATNET Newsletter 1 for more details.

Now details will be given on the work devoted to the computation of background error statistics for the ALADIN/HU model. The ALADIN/HU model is the operational version of ALADIN exploited in Budapest, with 8km horizontal and 31 levels vertical resolutions (the domain size is around 1600 km * 1150 km). The first objective of our work was to compute background error statistics based on the archived data available from the operational suite and compare the results with those obtained for different ALADIN domains and resolution.

The main tasks to be executed for this first goal were as follows:

The main conclusions of this work can be summarised hereafter: For the second part of the year the work had been continued along the ideas of Claude Fischer regarding the sensitivity of the NMC method with respect to the applied forecast lengths and time intervals for the lagged-type version (Siroka, 2000) of the NMC method. The main idea having lagged-type of statistics instead of using the classical NMC method is to rule out the effect of the large scale boundary conditions and take into account only those scales which are really important for such mesoscale analyses applications. The lagged-type notion means that the shorter forecasts for the NMC method is recomputed using the same boundary conditions as it is for the longer forecasts. The sensitivity tests consist in varying the forecast lengths and the time interval (the difference between the two forecast lengths). From this study it is expected that we will find the optimal length and time intervals to be used for the computation of background error statistics and consequently the optimal background error weights in 3DVAR. As it was mentioned the work had been started and the necessary new model runs are under execution. Already 3 months of data is accumulated allowing the start of the evaluation procedure. The evaluation is to be started at the beginning of 2001.

CONCLUSIONS

As a summary it can be said that good start can be noticed in the activities where HMS is concerned. It is valid also for the work carried out in Budapest. It is unfortunate that the post-doc position was not filled in Budapest during 2000, however it is strongly hoped that the work can be extended in 2001 with the help of a post-doc student. The plan for the last part of 2001 is to start the work on the variational type applications (sensitivity studies) with the help of a Ph. D. student.

REFERENCES

L. Berre, 1999: Estimation of synoptic and meso scale forecast error covariaces in a limited area model. Accepted to Monthly Weather Review.

M. Monteiro, 1998: Balanced Statistical Structures of Background Errors for ALADIN/LACE 3DVAR. ALADIN Internal Report. Available at Meteo France.

D. Parrish and J. Derber, 1992: The National Meteorological Center's spectral statistical interpolation analysis system. Monthly Weather Review, 120, 1747-1763.

W. Sadiki, C. Fischer and J.-F Geleyn, 2000: Mesoscale background error covariaces: recent results obtained with the limited-area model ALADIN. Accepted to Monthly Weather Review.

M. Siroka and R. Bubnova 2000: Background error statistics for LACE domain - a study. Technical Report of RC LACE, CHMI, Prague.

M. Siroka, 2000: Report on experiments with ALADIN/LACE 3DVAR. RC LACE Internal Report, CHMI, Prague.
 
 

alatnet4.gif 5. In Ljubljana (Slovenia)

The main focus of the ALATNET centre in Ljubljana in the first period is "Case studies aspects of high resolution models with the special interest in non-hydrostatic models".The work started with the arrival of the PhD candidate, Mr. Klaus STADLBACHER, in Ljubljana. The subject of his stay is: "Systematic qualitative evaluation of high-resolution non-hydrostatic model".

After the first initial time dealing mostly with arrangement of working environment (working place, computers, etc.) the work effort has especially been devoted to the first field in the working plan (topic 2.a), namely "Definition of the framework of experiments (domains, resolutions), choice of a set of reference situations".

First of all, the decision has been taken to concentrate especially in the IOP (Intensive Observation Periods) cases from MAP (Mesoscale Alpine Project) due to availability of additional observational data with high spatial and time resolution. There are also some non-conventional additional measurements available for that period (like wind profiler data, aircraft measurements, etc.) useful in this frame of our work. The main goal of the research in Ljubljana is to systematically evaluate the behaviour of high-resolution models. That is why the decision has been taken to find the cases where already the reference coupling model (in our case ALADIN/LACE) is close enough to reality (observed state).The main question we have to answer is what additional quality can models at higher resolution bring and not why the coupling model was wrong for some weather situation. The task of determination the reference dates is going on right now.

Due to high computer usage demands of non-hydrostatic model experiments, there was quite a lot of work done in order to make the preparation of climate files at high-resolution (so called configuration 923) easier. Although this was a more technical work we expect that with fulfilling this task, the creation of climatological files with arbitrary horizontal and vertical resolution will be much faster. The main advantage will be a freedom in moving the integration domain to the area of interest, where additional data are available, so that the computational domain could be much smaller, only covering the region of interest for the particular situation.

There were some initial efforts done also with the second item of the working programme (topic 2.b): "Validation of the current physics and non-hydrostatic dynamics: comparison to hydrostatic dynamics, to observations, identifying problems".

Various experiments were performed to obtain the information about the model behaviour. There were experiments repeated with the hydrostatic and non-hydrostatic versions of the model.The output for some meteorological fields were compared and some knowledge about the typical difference between the two types (hydrostatic/non-hydrostatic) of models was gathered. The fact that unrealistic rain bands appeared in the precipitation fields called for some additional experiments aiming to isolate reasons for that behaviour. The first conclusions after taking a look at the physical parameterisations in ARPEGE/ALADIN might be that the field of moisture convergence could be the reason of unrealistic rain bands, at least in situations where the convection scheme is active due to unstable layers. Some further studies will be needed in order to proof this idea and possibly find a solution for that problem. However, we are quite aware that in resolutions of about 5 km we may already be deep in the twilight region of numerical modelling, where parameterised and resolved phenomena appear at the same time and interact with a magnitude, uncontrollable with the present modelling technique.

A study of the influence of the ratio in horizontal resolution between coupling/coupled model is also on the way. First results show a significant sensitivity (there seems to be more noise in the meteorological fields near the border of integration domain when this ratio is bigger).

Over the next period or within about nine months (this is how much time Klaus Stadlbacher will still work in Ljubljana for his first visit) we expect to produce useful leads or perhaps even few instructive conclusions about how and when does the non-hydrostatic dynamics in the model really improve the model results and thus justify the increased computational costs.



Home